Blog

Good Ole Joe – US President MIA in First 100+ Days

We the citizens of the United States of America, whether center-left, center-right, or independent, must always pay close attention to the words and actions of extreme groups such as Progressive Democrats (extreme left), QAnon (extreme right), Antifa (extreme left), Proud Boys (extreme right), the extreme Marxist-trained founders/leaders of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement (extreme left), and the Wolverine Watchmen (extreme right).

There are other US extreme groups on both the left and right, but these seem to be the ones dominating the news over the past several years.

These groups are attempting to detrimentally and permanently change the USA way of life and values we’ve enjoyed for 245 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America in 1776.

My Friends Had it Right about a Joe Biden US Presidency

In my blog post of November 9, 2020, “Joe Biden – US President-Elect,” I expressed concern that the center-left US Senator Joe Biden of the past would be Missing in Action (MIA) as President.

This fear was based on my observation that a new version of Joe Biden, i.e., VP Biden under President Obama, was emerging.

I don’t think this more recent version of Joe Biden has the energy and stamina today to stand against the forceful push from a group of extremely progressive people that had been driving his campaign.

This same group of people are now in very important positions on his White House (WH) staff, in his US Presidential Cabinet, and the US Congress.

In the House of Representatives, six very vocal members of The Squad stand out as extremely progressive: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, NY-14; Ilhan Omar, MN-5; Ayanna Pressley, MA-7; Rashida Tlaib, MI-13; Jamaal Bowman, NY-16; and Cori Bush, MO-1.

The total count of progressives in the two houses of the Congress is 100 members (out of 535 total voting members of the US Congress) who form the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC).

There are numerous Presidential Cabinet members I consider to be especially troublesome in their progressive words and actions during the first 100 days of the Joe Biden Presidency. They are Kamala Harris, Vice President; Deb Haaland, Interior Secretary; Linda Thomas-Greenfield, US Ambassador to the UN; Miguel Cardona, Education Secretary; Lloyd Austin, Defense Secretary; Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security; Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Jennifer Granholm, Energy Secretary; John Kerry, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate; Merrick Garland, AG; Antony Blinken, Secretary of State; and WH Chief of Staff to President Biden, Ron Klain.

Several of my good conservative friends had warned me after reading my blog post on November 9, 2020, that a Biden Presidency would be a lot more progressive than I believed.

However, because of my memory of the centrist Senator Biden of the past, I was willing to wait until the end of the first 100 days of the Biden Presidency to make my determination on that point.

Now that the US has experienced the first 100+ days of the President Biden Administration, hands down my good conservative friends had it right. Of course, now my good liberal friends don’t agree with me.

Unfortunately, I’m now firmly convinced that the Good Ole Joe Biden centrist of the past in the US Senate is Missing in Action (MIA) as the current President of the US.

Why My Friends Had it Right

While I didn’t help vote Joe Biden into office, he is now the legitimate President of the USA, and thusly, my President. However, because of the progressive decisions coming out of the WH, he is not the unifying and centrist President he promised to be in the 2020 Presidential campaign.

Rather, the diametrical opposite.

I believe the reason for this is his extremely progressive WH staff which, in my opinion, was the primary force behind the selection of his Presidential Cabinet. I’m convinced they entered the WH on inauguration day, January 20, 2021, with a boatload of extremely progressive speeches and policies already written waiting for President Biden’s signature.

Today it is Standard Operating Procedure for newly inaugurated USA Presidents to lean heavily on their staff and cabinets for research into details for new policies. However, for President Biden’s WH team, the whole policymaking process is on progressive and “hate Trump” steroids.

In my opinion, the significant difference in Joe Biden’s transition to President from the other Presidents in my lifetime is his comparatively weak engagement in the whole policymaking process. His primary role seems to be the messenger rather than the policymaker.

Within President Biden’s first 100+ days, he has signed over 42 executive orders, most of which are specific to overturning what I and most conservatives/center-rights consider to be successful policies of past President Trump.

Examples of Extremely Progressive Policies

A couple of policy examples that President Biden has overturned are (1) asylum seeking migrants remain in Mexico until US asylum claim is approved by a US immigration court and (2) executive order to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency to construct strategically located “physical/hi-tech border wall sections” to funnel migrants through the official entry points on the US SW border.

Please read my “Trump Administration Policy Highlights 2017-20” blog post if you are interested in reviewing the plethora of accomplishments by President Trump that are ripe to be rescinded by President Biden’s administration.

President Biden and team are also trying to push legislation through a democrat-partisan-Congress designed to overturn “anything Trump.” While he is giving lip-service to bipartisan bills from Congress, his actions are mostly aligned with the progressive left wing of the Democrat party.

It is obvious to me that President Biden’s progressive WH staff and cabinet are intent on gutting the Trump policies whether they have been good for the people of the USA or not.

Modification/improvement in government policies is one thing and generally is always necessary and welcomed, but to totally throw out policies that have proven successful for the American people is another.

It is just wrong, and practically speaking, not very smart, frugal, and safe.

Just observe what has happened at the USA SW border in just the first 100+ days of President Biden’s term with the Mexican cartels doubling their human trafficking (170,000+ illegal border crossings per month) and fentanyl drug-running (enough to kill the combined populations of Maryland, Virginia, and Washington DC) across the border largely driven by Candidate/President-Elect/President Biden’s words and Executive Order actions.

Ultimately, by the significant majority of news accounts including the New York Times, what is happening at the US SW border is a humanitarian and security crisis. However, DHS Secretary Mayorkas and President Biden refuse to call it a crisis and insist the SW border is CLOSED.

The Biden administration refuses to revoke the Biden EOs that triggered the US SW border crisis.

It’s Time for the Silent Majority (Center-left, Center-right) to Wake Up

The systems that support the US way of life and values mentioned in the first few paragraphs of this post include our capitalistic economic system; religious freedom for all faiths; social system that is caring, compassionate, and delivered with “tough love;” and government system based on the rule of law (US Constitutional and statutory) and individual rights/protections of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

An example of an action that puts our US way of life and values in jeopardy is President Biden and his DOD Secretary, Lloyd Austin, approving the requirement of Critical Race Theory (CRT) being taught to our US military personnel. That is unconscionable and very divisive for the US military.

CRT inherently divides white people and people of color into two classes, oppressors and the oppressed. This obviously will not work for the military, since unification is among the very top requirements of having a strong and effective military.

CRT at its core is Marxist and had its beginnings in the US in the 1980s. It has gained tremendous traction in the US after the New York Times commissioned and then published “The 1619 Project” in August 2019.

This combination is too big a topic to discuss in this post, but here is a very disturbing quote from the article “Understanding CRT: Critical Theory and Critical Race Theory – Intersectionality (CRTI)” by Lance Cashion in November 2020. This quote should send chills up and down every Americans spine: “The CRTI worldview maintains that logic, reason, science as well as the Christian worldview and the nuclear family are tools that white people use to retain hegemonic power in order to continuously oppress black people and other intersectional (e.g., LGBTQ) groups.”

That is just the opposite of the America I know.

We Americans are not perfect and we’ve made some big mistakes, but we have also made tremendous effort over the past 155 years to not repeat those mistakes.

There is always hope for improvement, since we all are of “one blood” and race, the human race, created by God.

Another egregious example is President Biden and his Education Secretary, Miguel Cardona, communicating support and providing “carrot and stick” federal dollars to teach CRT in our public schools.

Yet another egregious example is President Biden and Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, authorizing and encouraging the display of firstly the BLM flag of the Black Lives Matter movement and now the LGBTQ Rainbow flag over the US Embassies around the world.

That status is solely relegated to the national flag of the United States of America.

On the one hand, It is very divisive to single out groups of US Citizens over others. On the other hand, it is very unifying to fly the US National Flag over the US embassies, since all groups of American citizens are represented.

These few examples are just the tip of the iceberg.

Therefore, I hope and pray for the sake of America that we all stay diligent, persistent, and vocal in attempting to defeat/modify all extreme groups’ actions including the extremely progressive US Presidential and Congressional policy decisions.

I do believe what used to be called the Silent Majority of moderate (center-left, center-right), practical, and hard working people in America still exists today.

We used to say the Silent Majority has finally “waked up” and taken corrective action when poked too hard and too many times by extreme ideologies of our society.

In my opinion, today the progressive extremists, i.e., the “woked,” present the largest and most immediate threat to the US way of life and values that we in the USA have faced since the 1970s.

We overcame the danger then, and I believe we can do it again.

It is time for the recently awakened Silent Majority to vociferously use its voice.

The good news is the voice of the Silent Majority is gaining strength daily.

Only God, and time will reveal which voice carries the day.

Trump Administration Policy Highlights 2017-20

I spent four years attempting a defense of President Trump’s bad behavior and since I don’t like bad human behavior, it was exhausting.

No more!

Donald J. Trump is no longer my President, so I personally feel liberated to switch from defense to offense.

Now looking beyond the bad behavior, since I am a center conservative in every phase of my life, I like most of the policy decisions that President Trump and his administration brought to the table over the past four years.

Were the policies perfect? No!

Were mistakes made? Of course! Big job, big country, big world, lot of potential for mistakes. The key is to recognize the mistakes as quickly as possible, and correct them in a prudent and timely fashion.

Were the mistakes of the President Trump administration addressed and corrected in a timely manner? I believe most of them were.

President is a big and important job with a lot of concurrent moving parts that impact people around the world 24 hours a day. So, no matter who is occupying the WH Oval Office at any point in time, I believe all citizens of the United States must “cut some slack” for that President, i.e., give him/her room to make mistakes and correct them.

If the President doesn’t correct the mistakes, then “slack time” is over and questioning begins.

Overall, I was very pleased with the implementation of President Trump’s policies because of the accomplished and high character cabinet members who groomed and rolled out the policies.

A few of my favorites are VP Mike Pence, UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, AG Bill Barr, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, OMB Director Mick Mulvaney, HHS Secretary Alex Azar, HUD Secretary Dr. Ben Carson, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Many, scratch that, virtually all of the liberal folks in the US will have impassioned arguments against the policies/actions by President Trump and his staff. So be it.

I welcome such arguments in the conversation about whether Trump’s center conservative policies were good or bad for the country and its people. It makes me “step up my game” to reshape and improve my logical and relevant arguments.

There is one fact about President Trump’s persona on which I believe both liberals and conservatives in the US can agree — He has a very high energy level!

Therefore, in four short years in office, he was able to make advancements concerning all of the issues on which he campaigned sans two — (1) signing a Major US Infrastructure Bill and (2) signing a Replace Obamacare Medical Insurance Bill.

He tried on those two issues, but the Congress, which always controls the appropriation of funds for the Executive Branch projects, would not cooperate.

Like an effective CEO, Trump recognized the Congressional resistance quickly and moved on to his plethora of other campaign promises by focusing on Military, Immigration, National Security, Law & Order, Economics, Religious Freedom, Employee Wages, Unemployment Reduction, Pro Life Movement, Tax Relief for all – individual and business, Climate & Energy, Foreign Affairs and Federal Courts.

I’m sure I’ve left something out of this issues list. However, this is a list that is quite impressive. Especially, since President Trump actually made significant progress in all of these areas.

It has been rare in my lifetime to see Presidential candidates’ promises during the election cycle being converted to actual deliverables during his first term in elected office.

President Trump did it.

Here are some of my impressions of how President Trump addressed twenty-five (25) of the major issues he faced as President. While I do not agree 100% with President Trump’s decisions on these issues, as a body of work, I believe he did a good job carrying out the duties of the office of the US Presidency.

Operation Warp Speed (OWS) Fights Covid-19

I believe President Trump’s premier achievement recorded in history will be Operation Warp Speed (OWS). I also believe that he could have appointed no better person to lead this project than Vice President Mike Pence.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, recorded the formation of this project like this: “Operation Warp Speed ( OWS) was a public–private partnership initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration to facilitate and accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. The first news report of OWS was on April 29, 2020, and the program was officially announced on May 15, 2020.” This OWS project team has diligently and urgently carried out the US efforts to fight the Coronavirus pandemic which began officially on March 11, 2020, as announced by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Under President Trump’s and VP Pence’s hands-on attention, the implemented pandemic solutions started with vaccine development and manufacturing through distribution and all the way to working with the states’ governors and Departments of Health to get the vaccine into people’s arms.

To assure the states would have enough vaccines to inoculate all their people [there are approximately 330,000,000 people in the United States], the OWS ordered 200,000,000 doses and options on 400,000,000 doses in December 2020 from pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Moderna (both vaccines require two shots, 3-4 weeks apart to be inoculated fully).

This greased the skids for the President Biden administration to very quickly order enough vaccine doses to stay consistent with the demand in the states as each state rapidly ramped up delivery of shots into its citizens’ arms.

Two vaccines [Moderna and Pfizer] were developed in record time and large trials of these vaccines were completed and approved by the FDA with Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in approximately 10 months.

Distribution to the state governments’ health departments began immediately with UPS and FedEx stepping up big time.

All of this was done in less than a year and people began receiving vaccinations in December 2020.

Literally, never in the recorded history of infectious diseases in the world has such a feat been accomplished in less than a year. Not even close. Also, the OWS team and President Trump worked with medical professionals and state governors, e.g., NY, to make sure the states received the PPE, ventilators, and portable hospital housing/beds they needed to support the capacity-busting numbers of COVID patient hospitalizations.

On Joe Biden’s Inauguration Day, January 20, 2021, almost 1 million people received a COVID vaccination. The total Americans who had been vaccinated prior to President Trump leaving office was 15,000,000 [Newsweek].

This is short of the 35,000,000 number President Trump’ team projected, but still a phenomenal accomplishment from the world knowing little to nothing about this virus to 15 million being fully vaccinated in the US in less than 12 months.

As of this writing, that number has grown to be close to 2.5 million people a day receiving shots with 41,000,000 being fully vaccinated.

While President Trump and his OWS team developed and put the overall plan in motion to defeat COVID19, President Biden was handed the baton January 20, 2021, to carry it across the finish line. So far, so good.

The trajectory for number increased per day of vaccination doses being delivered into arms has not changed since Trump, so that is good on President Biden.

As the distribution plan for vaccinations put in place by Trump’s OWS team continues to ramp up to full capacity under President Biden and team, the number of people vaccinated per day continues to grow at an excellent, steady pace. Also, the availability of vaccines manufactured and shipped throughout the US seems to be increasing at an excellent pace.

Economic Growth

Revitalized steady, positive growth in the US economy, highlighted by a steady increase with year-over-year GDP and jobs creation numbers as well as unemployment numbers reaching historic lows.

Reduction of debilitating regulations on businesses — small to large. After working 45 years in private and state/federal public sector “businesses;” I believe that most of these regulations were overreach.

They were so extensive, e.g., Dodd Frank financial regulations, that most large business corporations did not, could not efficiently or effectively implement a majority of them. They were just too constraining to allow companies to stay competitive.

Ultimately, instead of trying to implement the debilitating regulations, the businesses just paid the less expensive Federal fines. And yet, the businesses’ financial performance and safety-net environmental protection for the employees and consumers in the US showed steady improvement over the four years of Trump’s Presidency.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA): Lower taxes for businesses and individuals

The TCJA was signed by President Trump at the end of his first year in office on December 22, 2017.

This act cut individual income tax rates, doubled the standard deduction, and eliminated personal exemptions from the tax code (effectively, counterbalanced in favor of the taxpayer with the much larger standard deduction).

The top individual tax rate dropped from 39.6% to 37%. Numerous itemized deductions were eliminated or affected as well, but the net effect on taxes paid was reduced because of the much larger standard deduction for all taxpayers in all tax brackets.

The net result of the TCJA made the filing of taxes simpler as well as gave a tax break to all individual taxpayers in all seven (7) marginal tax brackets.

The messaging for all tax bills can be “spun” to promote whatever success or failure story one’s political party wants to promote, but in general, it is hard to deny that this tax bill acted as a significant stimulus on the US economy over the next several years prior to the arrival of the Covid19 pandemic in the US.

Another part of the TCJA was to reduce the federal tax on US businesses to create a robust business environment that is competitive with world businesses. The corporate income tax was reduced from 35% down to 21%.

Not only could businesses keep 14% more of their annual profit due to the lower tax rate, they could roll these savings back into the business to grow the business and create more jobs for people in the US.

The lower business income tax rate also allowed almost 2 trillion dollars held overseas by US based businesses to be repatriated to the US and used for business growth.

This return of US dollars to America added significantly to the boon for USA main street businesses during the Trump Presidency.

Of course, with business growth comes more jobs for Americans.

Win win!

All in all, the business section of the TCJA act was a resounding success and the US economy was off and running until the pandemic at or about an average 3% US GDP growth rate year over year.

Main Street Growth Leads to Low Unemployment and Stellar Wall Street Growth

By creating a positive Main Street businesses environment and financial picture, Wall Street was able to leverage that positivity with tremendous growth in President Trump’s tenure in the WH.

At the end of 2016, President Obama’s last full year in office, the Wall Street DJIA index was 19,751. On President Joe Biden’s inauguration day, the DJIA index was 31,188.

The growth of the stock market (referred to here as Wall Street) over time and on average is heavily dependent on the health of private businesses (referred to here as Main Street) that are publicly traded on Wall Street.

Over the period of President Trump in the WH, the growth of the DJIA was approximately 57%. Quite remarkable.

This high economic growth on Main Street and on Wall Street led to more jobs being created, which led to a labor unemployment rate at its lowest during President Trump’s term of around 3.5% on average across all employee demographics.

This was a 50 year low for the unemployment rate in the US for men and women. For Hispanics and blacks, the unemployment rate was the lowest rate ever recorded in the US.

Business Opportunity Zones in Struggling Inner City Neighborhoods

With Dr. Ben Carson, President Trump created Business Opportunity Zones in large inner cities infusing Federal dollars to create new businesses that significantly stimulated growth of businesses in these struggling inner city neighborhoods.

This effort was a catalyst that helped reduce the US poverty percentage to 10.5%, the lowest such percentage since this statistical measure was introduced in 1959. As a comparison, during the two (2) term Obama Presidency, the range of poverty in the US was 13-15%.

Each percentage point drop represents approximately 3.5 million people being lifted out of poverty.

Defeat of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)

Trump was the US Commander in Chief when the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terrorist caliphate was literally destroyed.

This caliphate was the governance structure of a Radical Islamic state of around 100,000 radical Muslims in the middle east at its peak.

The land part of the caliphate had quickly emerged and grown in the Obama days to include a significant combined land mass of 40% of Iraq and 33% of Syria.

Literally, all of the land grab was reversed within the first year of the Trump Presidency with land returned to the sovereign states of Iraq and Syria respectively.

USA Entered No New Long-Lasting Military Conflicts

President Trump did not get the USA into any new long-lasting military conflicts. Not true with the three Presidents immediately preceding Trump.

“During the Obama, Bush, and Clinton administrations, the Middle East was a hotbed for American military activity with no clear end in sight. Bill Clinton was involved in airstrikes against Serbia and Iraq, George Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq during the infamous War on Terror, and Barack Obama launched airstrikes and military raids in at least seven different countries around the world; Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq.” The Daily Wire

While President Trump wanted to draw down the number of US troops in the Middle East hotbed, he found that it was not simple and really couldn’t significantly change the footprint of US troops in the Middle East.

However, just the rapid defeat of ISIS in his first year of office went a long way toward not having to permanently increase the US military footprint in the Middle East during his term in office.

Supported Health & Human Services (HHS) “2018 Protect Life Rule

Strong supporter of the US Health and Human Services (HHS) department’s 2018 “Protect Life Rule.” Also, supporter of the Congressional Hyde Amendment which required abortion businesses to both fiscally and physically separate family planning/birth control services from their abortion-related business.

The 2018 “Protect Life Rule” also stated that family planning centers must stop referring patients for abortions in order to receive Title X funding. Title X states, “None of the funds appropriated under this title shall be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning.” HHS under Trump worked to ensure this was properly enforced.

Planned Parenthood (PP) chose not to get Title X funds, because they did not want to follow the guideline of not recommending abortion as a means of family planning. That is $170M annually they refused.

Although, annually PP gets approximately $500M from another Federal budget line item (actually paid by reimbursements through Medicaid) for the direct delivery of reproductive rights services, e.g., contraceptives.

However, the Hyde amendment prevents these federal tax dollars from being used for direct abortion services.

PP is responsible for about 350,000 elective abortions a year.

Appointed 287 Federal Judges Including Three to the US Supreme Court

Appointed three extremely capable US Constitutional Originalists to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) — Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

Filled 54 federal circuit court of appeals judge positions and 174 federal district court judges.

In terms of Article I courts, Trump made 26 appointments: 10 for the United States Court of Federal Claims, 7 for the United States Tax Court, 6 for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 2 for the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and 1 for the United States Court of Military Commission Review.

President Trump designated Susan G. Braden, Margaret M. Sweeney, and Eleni M. Roumel as chief judges of the Court of Federal Claims.

On the Article IV territorial courts, President Trump made 1 appointment.

Supported Immigration Policies that Stabilized the US Southern Border

Implemented strong and effective immigration policies through Presidential Executive Orders. Funding had to be reallocated from other line items in the current Federal Budget in effect, since Congress was unable to come together in a bipartisan manner and fund such a new immigration bill.

The last comprehensive immigration bill passed by the full US Congress was on November 6, 1986, with President Reagan.

Under the Trump administration, new southern border walls (80 miles) were built. Grossly ineffective walls in the hot spots on the US-Mexico border (373 miles) were replaced with hi-tech, modern, effective walls. This improved the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency’s ability to funnel prospective illegal immigrants through CBP checkpoints rather than allow them to become illegal immigrants by crossing through a much more unprotected part of the US-Mexico border.

Disallowed illegal immigrants to be released into the US for a future date hearing in a US Immigration Court just by declaring they are seeking asylum in the US. A very small percentage (~10%) of those requesting asylum actually met the criteria for becoming an asylee. The criteria for becoming an asylee must be that the person is “…fleeing death or persecution by their country’s government officials for their race, religion, nationality, or membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”

The primary common reason for migrants fleeing their home country is economic conditions are not amenable to living above the poverty line with no real chance of improving anytime soon.

By US law and international law, this is not a criterion for becoming an asylee in the US.

It is undisputed that law and order conditions in the migrants’ home countries are untenable for a good quality of life. Criminal gangs control the neighborhoods in which these people live and often their lives and their children’s lives are threatened by the gangs who require “payments” from the residents.

Also, not a criterion for becoming an asylee in the US.

Over the past 20 years, multi-billions of US dollars of aid money from the US to Central American countries just seems to end up in corrupt country leaders’ pockets, and not in the hands of the citizens to improve their living conditions.

I believe a large majority of Americans, liberal and conservative, sympathize with the poor living conditions of these Central American citizens, yet prefer that these migrants use the proper channel to enter the US as legal immigrants.

However, I also believe that the progressive wing of the liberal party sees the unsettled circumstances at the US southern border as a positive step toward implementing their preference for open borders.

Just as President Obama deported violent criminals that are illegal immigrants, so did President Trump. Actually, President Obama is the President on record that deported more illegal immigrants than any other President in recent history.

President Trump eliminated the Obama “catch and release” policy that allowed illegal immigrants to be released into the US for a promise (rarely kept) of making an appearance at a future date/place before a US immigration judge.

Trump worked with Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador government officials to encourage them to use their own border laws and asylum laws. That actually was working pretty well in the last year of Trump’s term.

One point that is never discussed is that many of the high integrity leaders of these Latin American countries do not want their citizens to emigrate to the US. They are trying to improve the economic and “law and order” conditions of the countries to encourage their people to stay in their home countries. Unfortunately, they simultaneously have to fight corruption in their own leadership ranks.

Trump attempted to expand the President Obama policy of separating a child from his/her “parent” only if human trafficking were suspected by an illegal immigrant. Under President Obama, inadequately provisioned facilities were used to house the separated children. There was a time limit that these children could stay at this CBP facility. After the time limit, HHS would get involved to house these children in more permanent facilities and try and locate family members in the US with which to place these children.

President Trump ultimately implemented a “zero tolerance” policy that expelled all adults who illegally crossed the border. However, in many cases their kids had already been separated, and thus were left as unaccompanied minors in the US.

President Trump had to quickly reverse this policy since there was tremendous public outrage against this policy for humanitarian reasons. But, not before some 3,000 unaccompanied children were in the custody of HHS.

Which is more immoral, putting children in jail with “parents” who entered the US illegally, or separating children into more amenable holding facilities?

It seems plausible to me that a large number of the “parents” were really not the parents of the separated children. Out of the 628 remaining in the US today (3,000 total were separated) who remain estranged from a parent (circa January 2021), the “parents” are no where to be found and are not seeking to find their easily found “kids” like a caring parent would work tirelessly to do.

Unfortunately, the separation of children from their families is still happening at the border today (March 23, 2021) under the President Biden administration. It is not happening on the US side of the border, rather on the Mexico side in the border migrant camps. This, in itself, is a humanitarian crisis.

Please read this Politico Magazine article for details: (https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/03/20/border-family-separation-mexico-biden-477309) to get the full picture of this very complex and insolvable problem over the past 20 years and three US Presidents.

Personally, I believe the only way to solve this problem on earth is for every human being in the human race to follow Jesus’ command: “Love God, love your neighbor as yourself.”

Sadly, not going to happen. But, I believe those of us who believe and try to live this command have the responsibility to continue to spread this truth as far and wide as we can.

Supported Passage of Prison Reform – The First Step Act

Supported the passage of prison reform by Congress, the First Step Act.

Spearheaded by Senator Tim Scott, South Carolina, in the US Senate. For an overview of this Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) reform act, please review this link BOP: First Step Act Overview .

Provided Support for Expanding/Modernizing the US Military

Financially supported an expansion/modernization of the US military personnel and equipment which were significantly diminished prior to the Trump Presidency.

President Obama’s final year budget for the US DOD was $605B and President Trump’s was $740B.

Recognized Jerusalem as Capital of Israel

The US has always been the most steadfast and strongest ally of Israel since President Truman recognized its creation: “U.S. President Harry Truman was the first world leader to officially recognize Israel as a legitimate Jewish state on May 14, 1948, only eleven minutes after its creation.”

President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel by moving the US Embassy from Tel Aviv, Israel, to Jerusalem was a long awaited step by Israel.

Even though the capital of Israel has always been Jerusalem since its creation, because of the general unrest between Israel and Palestinians with Jerusalem being the Holy City for both Judaism and Islam, the US embassy was built in 1966 in Tel Aviv.

Many of the modern day US Presidents during their election campaigns said they would make this move of the US Embassy to Jerusalem, but none did until Trump.

This was an amazing move and provided an enormous boost to the US-Israel relationship. It seems like a simple move, and it is on the surface, but the message that was sent to Israelis and around the world with this move was very, very loud.

For Israel alone, it lifted the spirit of the nation and its leaders tremendously.

Stood Strong with Israel Against Iran

By their own admission, Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has a primary goal to annihilate Israel from the face of the earth.

“A website with close ties to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has outlined why it would be acceptable to kill all Jews and annihilate Israel.” Dailymail.com

Iran leaders, of course, also have the United States in their nuclear weapons sights.

In 2015, during President Obama’s 2nd term, Iran agreed to a long-term deal on its nuclear program with a group of world powers known as the P5+1 – the US, UK, France, China, Russia and Germany. This accord was called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

With the $4B dollars President Obama delivered to Iran leaders via the JCPOA, Iran has never stopped its development of fuel for nuclear weapons and the missile delivery systems. Also, they have used much of the $4B given to them by President Obama’s administration, not to help the people of Iran, but to support the terrorist groups in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine/Gaza, and Yemen.

Of course, all of the Iran backed terrorist groups sharing a border with Israel continue to bomb Israel with impunity.

President Trump stood strong with Israel against Iran backed militia/terrorist activity in the region — e.g., Syria (President al-Assad and impoverished Syrian people propped up by Iran’s money and militia), Lebanon (Hezbollah), and Gaza (Hamas).

He has also stood by Saudi Arabia and their conflict in Yemen with the Houthi’s, another Iranian backed terrorist group.

Facilitated Israel Alliance with Arab Countries

Facilitated establishing Peace/Alliance agreements with Israel and several Arab/northeastern African countries, i.e., UAE, Bahrain, and Sudan.

This is a major change in the middle east and northeastern Africa landscape. Israel and these countries made historic peace agreements in the region during the last year of President Trump’s term in office.

The most recent previous such agreements were in 1979, Egypt-Israel, President Jimmy Carter; and 1994, Jordan-Israel, President Bill Clinton. This is a long time (a quarter of a century) since the last Israeli-Arab/northeastern Africa country peace/partnership agreement.

This long period without an agreement was not due to lack of effort of the US Presidents’ staffs, but none was able to pull it off until President Trump with the on-the-ground leadership of his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Forced NATO Member Countries to be Better Contributors to the Cause

Applied pressure on the European member countries of NATO who benefit tremendously from the protections of NATO against Russia, pressuring them to actually pay their 2% of GDP fair share for NATO protections.

Today, NATO is stronger than ever, and most of the European countries are now making attempts to or are paying their fair share of the costs for NATO.

Before President Trump, these European countries just expected the US to pay the bulk of the costs for NATO.

Put Intense Pressure on China Communist Party (CCP)

Pressured China Communist Party (CCP) to stop stealing US technology innovation secrets through every means possible including Cyber Warfare.

Pressured CCP to improve egregious humanitarian treatment of their citizens and nonresidents, e.g., brain washing, political incarceration, daily gang rapes by “prison” guards.

Implemented US sanctions against CCP for aggressive, imperialistic behavior in the region, e.g., (1) mistreatment of citizens in Hong Kong by not respecting their agreement to be an autonomous and free city-state of China, (2) repeated attempts to re-acquire Taiwan as a province of the CCP, (3) and building Chinese islands and military bases in the South China Sea international waters.

Imposed US tariffs on China imports to correct CCP monopolistic controls on trade between US and China.

Pressured China to revise the cornerstone of its economic policy of managing the yuan (Chinese dollar) exchange rate to benefit its exports. China does not have a floating exchange rate that is determined by market forces, as is the case with most advanced economies. Instead it pegs its dollar, the yuan (or renminbi), to the U.S. dollar, always positioning China’s dollar to benefit its exports to the US.

This is a total disregard by the CCP for currency fluctuations due to market forces between the USD and other world currencies.

Pulled US Out of Iran Deal – Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)

Reversed the US involvement in the JCPOA with Iran by withdrawing from the Iran nuclear weapons deal with the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States—plus Germany) together with the European Union.

The JCPOA agreement was brokered by President Obama’s Secretary of State, John Kerry.

One of the first actions of the Obama deal was to air transport $4B US dollars in cash to the Iranian government. Iran was not required to fully stop the development of nuclear capabilities, at least not the enrichment of low-grade uranium. They were only expected to slow down the enrichment development and upon request by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), allow full and immediate inspections of their R&D sites.

The idea was Iran could not enrich weapons-grade uranium. But, the full extent of the spirit of the deal was to stop development of all activities that would assist or accelerate Iran’s ability to build nuclear weapons.

Immediate, on-demand inspections never were granted by Iran to the JCPOA partners via the IAEA.

And, Iran continued to do development and testing of ballistic missiles. Missiles testing was overlooked when the JCPOA was written, and Iran wasn’t about to give up any weapons development of any sort. They just did it covertly.

Of course, ballistic missiles were being tested with conventional warheads, which could easily be converted to carry nuclear payloads.

The premier provision of the JCPOA for Iran was they would be able to continue nuclear weapons development unrestricted after 15 years from the start of the JCPOA.

Based on the preponderance of news reports from Iran, the exorbitant amount of cash of $4B from President Obama was not used for the intended purpose of helping Iran’s economy to benefit the quality of life for the Iranian people.

As best we in the USA can tell, the cash has been used to fund terrorist activity in the Middle East, e.g., Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, and Yemen.

Most of this terrorist activity has been directed against Israel.

Pressured Russia Over its Bad World Citizen Behavior

Extreme sanctions on Russia due to egregious domestic and world stage behavior, e.g., interfering with US elections, killing or imprisoning domestic political opposition leaders by the Russian communist party, imperialistic activity internationally — for example a landgrab of Crimea from Ukraine.

Pulled out of Paris Climate Accord (PCA) and the World Health Organization (WHO)

I don’t think these were good moves per se for the US.

I do believe it is very important to have the US voice central to the conversations about world Anthropogenic Climate Change and world health issues that affect every country in the world, e.g., the Covid19 pandemic.

These organizations do not make binding decisions for its member organizations, but they do help orchestrate the development of solutions and the dissemination of such solutions to its members for large, world-size problems.

However, both of these organizations need a “disruptive” voice such as the United States in the conversation to encourage them to put pressure on the bad actors of the world such as the CCP of China to be better world citizens relative to climate and human health.

Led USA to become Energy Independent

Led the charge for the US to become energy independent by working with the Energy private sector to increase US energy exploration, fracking (natural gas), and drilling on US public lands.

Very good for stabilizing and lowering gasoline prices and heating fuel costs in the US.

Also, extremely important for National Security.

Overturned President Obama’s Decision to Stop XL Pipeline Development

Allowed resumption of XL Pipeline development that had been stymied by President Obama.

This was extremely important to one of our most important geopolitical allies, Canada.

Also, very good for the US labor force that is highly skilled in the Energy Sector, specifically the Oil Industry.

The XL Pipeline is a much more environmentally friendly and safe solution then the rail cars that currently transport this oil to Canada from the US.

“According to a study in 2014 performed by Karen Clay, a professor of public policy and economics at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, transporting oil by rail: (1) Causes about 50% more GreenHouse Gas (GHG) emissions than doing so via pipeline; (2) Results in 2x the health and environmental costs when compared to those associated with shipping oil via pipeline; and (3) Sees 8x greater costs than pipeline accidents and spills.” Pipelines vs. Rail: Which Method is Safer for Transporting Oil? – Canada Action

Strong Supporter of USA Working Class

President Trump is an extremely strong advocate of the working class American.

He built strong relationships and support for the working class folks of the US, especially in business sectors such as Manufacturing and Energy.

Ballast to North Korea’s Nuclear Weapon Aggression in the World

Attempted to normalize relations with North Korea. Unfortunately, it didn’t do much long term good, which has been typical for a long time since the Kim family dynasty came to power in 1948.

But President Trump’s symbiotic relationship with Kim Jong Un, the current North Korea Supreme Leader, did stabilize and calm the relationship of North Korea in the world community during his four year term.

For a “moment in time” in history, the nuclear weapon development and delivery threat of North Korea has been silent.

Of course, North Korea with the Kim family dynasty in power is always “out there smoldering.”

Established US Space Force

Establishment of the US Space Force branch of the military to complement the current branches of the US military.

This is absolutely critical to the National Security of the US in the future.

Space seems to be more and more a territory in which the US will have to protect its assets and security interests in space as they relate to US territory on earth.

Organizationally in the US Armed Forces, the US Space Force reports to the US Department of the Air Force along with its sister branch, the US Air Force.

The mission of the United States Space Force is:

“The United States Space Force Act codified the Space Force as organized, trained, and equipped to “provide freedom of operation for the United States in, from, and to space” and “provide prompt and sustained space operations,” with its stated duties enumerated as to “protect the interests of the United States in space, deter aggression in, from, and to space, and conduct space operations.”

President Biden: No CRISIS at the border

How is it that President Biden’s Administration will not call the migration event at the US Southern border a CRISIS, and yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been ordered (Saturday, March 13) by President Biden to provide assistance to the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency?

This is a true oxymoron — Biden says there is no CRISIS and yet the US premier agency whose mission is to manage US CRISES/DISASTERs is called in to assist.

Are clues that point to this continuing event being a CRISIS missed or purposefully ignored by the Biden Administration? Of course not! It’s silly to think otherwise, since the real reason in our US society today is always politics. No more, no less.

But stick with my logic for a bit to see how foolish it is to refuse to call this event what it really is, a CRISIS.

The foremost descriptive word in the title of the FEMA agency is EMERGENCY, which is a synonym for CRISIS in the Merriam Webster Thesaurus.

Also, my understanding from first-hand experience riding out Hurricane Katrina and reading FEMA’s official website “capstone doctrine” about its mission is that “FEMA exists to help people, before, during, and after DISASTERs. This is [its] mission.”

The last time I checked, CRISIS is a precursor to DISASTER, and therefore, if FEMA is now involved on the border, then the US is in an extended CRISIS mode as this DISASTER continues to grow daily.

So, please President Biden and team (especially your press secretary), quit playing word games by stretching the truth and thinking we the USA people are buying what you are selling.

I thought you had more respect for us, the people of the USA, than to expect us to be so naive.

This is a very serious and dangerous humanitarian CRISIS at the border for the migrants, which by the way, are not just Latin Americans seeking to find a better life for themselves and their families.

Of course, in any group of this size there is also a measurable percentage who are criminals and will seize any opportunity to cause damage to those around them, either property or bodily.

Also, there is credible evidence that terrorists from other regions of the world are seizing this CRISIS opportunity to cross the US southern border undetected, e.g., recently CBP has reported identifying terrorists from Yemen, a middle eastern country.

And, last but not least, are the citizens of the USA who will be harmed by this CRISIS. Especially, those Americans who live in towns on the US side of the southern border in states such as Texas, Arizona, and California. But, don’t think the harm stops at the border states. It does not.

All the modern day US Presidents I have heard quoted about the priority of the President’s responsibilities say the primary responsibility of the President of the USA is to provide safety and security for this sovereign country and its citizens/residents.

Unfortunately, the biggest winners in this CRISIS situation are the Mexican cartels with their profiteering from human trafficking and illegal drug (fentanyl) sales. The increases in both are enormous for the first few months of CY21.

And, of course, the migrants who survive the dehumanizing treatment on the long trek northward from as far away as El Salvador (~1450 miles), if caught at the border, are released within a few days by CBP “into the wind” as asylum seekers in the USA. They can be considered as winners of sorts, but their struggles are far from being over when they are released into the US.

President Biden; please don’t forget that President Obama, you as his VP, and the entire administration team; refused to identify by name the root cause of the formation and rapid growth of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terrorist group and its caliphate landgrab crusade primarily in Iraq and Syria.

This landgrab was enormous in size and the speed with which it occurred. It consisted of 33% of Syria’s sovereign land plus 40% of Iraq’s at its peak.

That team’s mistakes resulted in a four year war against ISIS in the middle east that was birthed, grew, and festered during the entire 2nd term of the Obama Administration.

Finally, with superior US military equipment and focused US expertise advising Iraqi, Kurdish, and Turkish forces, ISIS was soundly and totally defeated by the end of President Trump’s first year in office (2017). All the land that was grabbed by ISIS was returned to Syria and Iraq.

In my opinion (and many others), the defeat of ISIS was largely due to actually giving a name to the problem, Radical Islam. This group was only composed of approximately 100,000 radicals out of 1.6B peaceful members of the Islam religion.

President Biden, you and President Obama let it be known that you were concerned that all Americans would consider all 1.6B Muslims (Islam practitioners) in the world as the enemy if Radical Islam were identified as the root cause of the conflict.

It is disappointing to me that you had no more faith in the American people than that. Did some of that hateful behavior occur when the problem was named Radical Islam?

Unfortunately, yes! But, no more than the relatively small “normal curve” percentage of the human race that generally tends toward hate as its moral compass.

Just giving a name to a problem seems like an oversimplification, but until one actually “names” a problem and gives clarity to the scope of the problem, there is very little chance to succeed in rallying the mindshare and dedication of people and the financial resources to defeat the problem.

President Biden, you are now our President, so please don’t repeat this pattern from the Obama 2nd term of NOT properly identifying problems you face as President with (1) the obvious name, e.g., CRISIS, and (2) the root cause, e.g., your “unintended” signal that the US border is open which was sent to Central Americans when you within a few days reversed ALL of the previous administration’s immigration policies with your own executive orders.

I understand you didn’t like President Trump’s immigration policies and you wanted to change them all, but in my opinion, you should have taken a more measured approach.

For example, getting prepared for the automatic increase in asylum seekers, mostly illegal crossings, by setting up personnel, processes and facilities to handle such an increase in border crossings for the different people groupings before “ripping the band aid off with one stroke.”

Actually, President Trump’s policies had calmed the illegal border crossings and had the cooperation and support of the Central American government officials. These policies had made our US southern border more secure against human and illegal drugs trafficking by the criminal cartels and penetration by embedded foreign terrorists.

Based on your statements in the 2020 Presidential campaign, you felt the Trump policies were immoral.

Except for the separation of children from their parents at the border; which by the way was corrected by Trump almost immediately after the initial instatement of the order and unfortunate lingering effects; I disagree with your assessment. Even with the act of separating children from the family, which is more moral — separating children from their parents and placing them in humane care centers or placing the children in jail with their parents? That’s another conversation for another day.

And please, please, please, do not blame President Trump for this current immigration CRISIS.

Uh, oh. Too late. I just saw that your administration and the Congressional leaders have already blamed Trump.

Don’t expect the thinking people of the US, which I believe to be a very large majority of the US population, to buy it.

You own this!!!

Please be smart in your decision making, and do not let the progressive segment of the Democrat party push you around.

I know in the past when you were in the US Senate and even in your last Presidential campaign, you espoused centrist policy positions. You now give lip service to unification across the ideological divide in the USA, but your actions do not back up your words.

It would be great for the country if you follow your own heart rather than give in to the progressive policies of the extreme left caucus. President Clinton comes to mind as a perfect role model for you as President (sans his character flaws that are well chronicled in US history). Personally, I don’t think President Obama is a good role model for you.

I and other center conservatives can support increasing the number of legal immigrants coming to America yearly. That number has been 1,000,000 per year on average for a while now. It needs to be revisited. I believe a compromise can be reached to increase that number by 500,000 – 1,000,000 per year.

Immigration policy negotiations is a perfect opportunity for you to start US unification by reaching across the political isle.

I can even support providing legal status and a pathway to citizenship for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), also known as The Dreamers. These folks (approximated 11,000,000; but who really knows), now adults, were minor children when they were brought to this country via their illegal immigrant parents.

They had no input into the decision making process of their parents to break the US immigration laws to initially get into this country. So, I don’t think they should be held accountable, and there should be a plan for them to stay in the US after all these years. For most of them, this literally is the only country they know.

I cannot support illegal immigration encouraged by a border control plan that exacerbates the border CRISIS we have today.

As best I can tell, this CRISIS is caused primarily by you announcing to Central Americans that they will be able to enter the USA if they make it over the US border, legally or illegally.

Oh, you didn’t do this in those exact words, but the “message” you projected to the economically poor people in the Central American countries was just that.

You have since told them in exact words to not come YET, since the Covid pandemic and our US Immigration System is just not ready to allow this to happen. These words have obviously fallen on deaf ears, since the 30,000 unaccompanied minors processed by CBP in February 2021 is 5x that of January 2021. Also, this number in February 2021 is as high as the entire year of 2020.

All those, unaccompanied minors or adults, who are legally allowed or who illegally step on US soil only have to declare they are seeking political asylum and they will be granted an asylum hearing before a US Immigration Judge. Since the court system is clogged with an exorbitant backlog of cases, it will be years before such court dates are available. Until such time, these “asylum seekers” will be released into the USA, all for a promise from the migrant that s/he will be present in a US Immigration Court on a predetermined date/time.

History has shown the greatest majority of these migrants who entered illegally will be no shows on the court date. They are truly “in the wind,” rarely to ever be found again by the US CBP or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.

This is a terrible plan.

Therefore, we are pulling for you to do the right things and reverse this CRISIS for our country and its people. The migration data shows that this current CRISIS started on January 20, 2021, your Presidential Inauguration date.

Do the math!

There are US immigration solutions that have been shown by the previous US Presidential administration to work and are humane and sensible for a sovereign law and order country.

If you don’t like those solutions (I personally think they were fine, but there is always room for improvement), then go to work with both political parties of the US Congress and come up with what you consider to be better solutions.

President Biden, just keep in mind that immigration is a very complex problem with deep divides in ideologies, morality foundations, and social philosophies.

However, I do think there is common ground that is sensible and compromise is possible across these divides if you really give your best effort.

Godspeed.

Procedural Due Process for the Preborn Child

For every abortion in the world, the two primary stakeholders are the mother (woman) and the preborn child (person).

I’m fully on board with protecting the rights of the woman, the mother. After all, I’m a proud husband, father, father-in-law and grandfather to nine women. I always wish the very best and equal justice for all of them.

However, in my opinion, this is not solely a women’s rights issue as many good people wish to make it. It is an equal justice issue for the mother and the preborn child.

To have equal justice in every pregnancy, in addition to consideration for the mother there is one other primary person who has equal individual rights under the US Constitution that must be protected — i.e., the preborn child whose human life begins at conception.

Every human being (person) begins her/his maturation process within the first second after conception as a single cell Zygote. The Zygote forms itself immediately as a human organism, a fact that is supported today by the preponderance of scientific evidence.

This fact is also supported by the leading abortion doctor in the USA, Dr. Willie Parker (Abortion provider Willie Parker Admits “Abortion Kills a Human Being, I Agree” | LifeNews.com). Dr. Parker estimates he has performed over 20,000 abortions.

He is a long-time, self-identified Christian, and rationalizes the dichotomy of Christian teachings opposed to abortion and his pro abortion position with the belief the mother’s/woman’s moral choice always supersedes the choice for the human being in her womb.

In his new memoir “Life’s Work,” Parker writes “I believe that as an abortion provider, I am doing God’s work, I am protecting women’s rights, their human right to decide their futures for themselves, and to live their lives as they see fit.”

With these aforementioned predicates, the human Zygote organism at conception and the fetus in latter stages of womb development are fully human. They are no less or no more human biochemically (DNA) and spiritually than a more mature version of the human person when exiting the womb. One is just more experienced, physically larger/stronger, and wiser as he/she progresses through the maturation stages of life.

This means the Zygote or the fetus is not just one of many body parts of the mother, rather it is a preborn human being living within the confines of the mother’s womb.

If the mother is living in the US, this preborn child is fully protected by the US Constitution.

One argument for many good and caring people who support elective abortion is that the preborn child at the earliest stages of the pregnancy is not life viable outside the mother’s womb, and therefore is not a separate person with individual rights provided by the US Constitution.

Not so fast.

Even after exiting the womb, children are still dependent and not life viable on their own if not provided every means of life sustenance and care by their parents. And, yet, it is well established these post born children have full individual rights provided by the US Constitution.

Therefore, life viability is not a determining factor for the applicability of individual US Constitutional rights whether at the beginning of human life or for that matter, the end of life (another topic, another day).

Now, moving on to the central point of my argument, elective abortion is defined as “the interruption of a pregnancy before the 20th week of gestation at the woman’s request for reasons other than maternal health or fetal disease. Most abortions in the United States are performed for this reason.” [From Britannica.com]

In my opinion, during the elective abortion decision making process, an advocate for the preborn child (person) is required to argue in defense of the child’s right to life. This right is established for all persons in the US by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments of the US Constitution.

In my estimation, the most relevant part of this overarching clause is the Procedural Due Process right expressed for every American. This right essentially is a “legal doctrine in the United States that requires government officials to follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property except as authorized by law.” [From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]

Because Roe v Wade is such law, albeit settled law of almost 50 years through precedence set at the US Supreme Court level and not the legislative process, abortions are protected as legal at the federal level and therefore all those involved in the abortion are protected from punishment by the government.

This automatically embeds the government as a silent partner in every elective abortion decision making process, since the mother cannot be convicted of a crime when the preborn child is put to death. Of course, neither can the abortion medical providers.

Personally, I don’t want a mother or the medical professionals who assist her to go to jail for having or assisting in an abortion. Rather, my desire is that the mother choose alternative ways to support life for the unwanted preborn child through options such as adoption; nonprofit prolife organizations providing financial aid; federal Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) centers under the Federal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program of the USDA; etcetera.

As for the rights of the preborn child, the Due Process Clause should also provide protection, but today, it sadly does not.

Since the child cannot speak for him/herself, I think the government should at least provide protection for the child by appointing and financing a guardian ad litem to argue for the life of the preborn child. In deference to females naturally understanding pregnancy at a deeper and more personal level than males, I think the guardian ad litem should be female.

Actually, I’m okay with some of the good effects from Roe v Wade as settled law. It makes the healthcare facilities more safe and medical professionals more skilled at performing necessary abortion procedures, e.g., in cases of rape, incest, and the severe physical, mental, and/or emotional health of the mother. Tough decisions all.

However, I’m not in favor of carte blanche use of my tax dollars to support elective abortion organizations in the US such as Planned Parenthood. In other words, I support the Hyde Amendment which prevents that.

I also am not in favor of my US tax dollars supporting elective abortions in foreign countries. For example, I’m not in favor of President Biden’s action to rescind US policy that disallows use of US tax dollars for elective abortions in foreign countries financially supported by the US.

I’m okay with the IRA providing a check box on the individual IRS Tax Return to opt in/out of donations taken from one’s federal income tax return to support abortion provider organizations. Even though I disagree with people who want to support such organizations that provide elective abortion services, I think it is okay for them to be given the mechanism to route some of their tax dollars to those organizations if they choose.

In severe/necessary abortion cases, it often becomes a matter of which of the two primary stakeholders will die. In those cases, we need the best physical healthcare possible as well as mental and emotional care.

But, for elective abortions, I believe we need a more deliberative decision making process which should include a guardian ad litem (advocate) for the preborn child.

As it stands today, the one primary stakeholder who is guaranteed to die in every elective abortion, i.e., the preborn child, is not given her/his “day in court.”

Unfortunately, the right of Procedural Due Process for preborn children seems to be conveniently overlooked in our US society today. And, if it were invoked, it would immediately be challenged in the US Justice system by pro abortion activists.

In my opinion, this is gross negligence by our culture/society and for the betterment of our society should be corrected.

The annual average count for abortions in the US in the past 47 years is around 1,000,000 per year (mostly elective).

As a comparison, the number of COVID19 deaths for one year ending 1/21/2021 was around 415,000 in the US, less than half the yearly US average for elective abortions.

The stark difference in the “outrage meter” evoked by comparing these two counts for one year is astonishing and disappointing.

I believe as a civilized society with compassionate human beings in the US and the world we have it within us to be better than that.

Joe Biden – US President-elect 2020

I voted against Joe Biden for President, but as best I can tell, there is no conclusive evidence that indicates he did not win the race fair and square. Of course, as I write this blog post, there is still a flurry of legal activity by President Trump’s team to prove wide-spread election fraud, and time will tell if there is any actual evidence to support their position.

In the meantime, from the evidence I’ve been able to uncover, all of the accusations and legal challenges about material fraud of the election results across our great country are baseless.

So, as I was taught by my mother and father, I extend congratulations to the winning team and accept the reality that Joe Biden is the President-elect and Kamala Harris is the Vice President-elect of the US.

Being a politically independent centrist myself, I’m not thrilled that Joe and Kamala won.

Counter to what I think is best for our country, Joe and Kamala at times in the Democrat primary and US general election have both strongly supported extreme left positions on important issues such as abortion, Covid19, racism, prison reform, judicial reform, police reform, socialized medicine, climate change (GND), energy, China, Iran, Israel, Russia, North Korea, immigration, regressive taxes on US citizens and businesses, and debilitating regulations on US businesses to name a few.

Of course, all of these are very important issues that affect all the people of the US. These issues are and always will be in need of detailed attention and reasonable reforms as required. But extreme measures of reform, whether to the left or to the right, in my opinion are uncalled for and detrimental to the health and welfare of the citizens of the US.

On another note, I am very pleased that the US has now elected a woman who is a person of color to the position of Vice President. This is a big step toward a woman being elected President of the US in the future.

Notwithstanding biological sex or color, I’m always for choosing the best person for the Presidency in any one single election. I believe this VP choice to be a significant step toward women being viewed in future elections as serious contenders in the mix of “best people” for the job.

On January 20, 2021, Joe Biden will become the President of the United States of America. Of course, that means he will be my President, and I’ll pray regularly that he is successful in doing good things for the USA and all the people living within the borders of the USA and other peace seeking countries of the world.

My main reason for voting against Joe Biden was I didn’t think he had the stamina/strength, or desire in certain cases (i.e., he agreed), to resist the policy platform being forged by the extreme left progressive caucus of the Democrat party.

In the past, I have admired him for his Democrat centrist position during the several decades he spent in the US Senate. However, in the past decade he has moved to the left of that position and in my opinion, often touches on the extreme.

I’m hopeful that he will return to that more centrist way of governing now that the extremely contentious Democrat party primary and the US General Election are over.

Virtually all politicians say and do things in election campaigns they know they cannot deliver nor would they necessarily want to deliver. For them, it is all about getting elected and they leave it to the voters to discern what is truth and reality and what is not.

Several months ago, Robert Redford in a public appeal to USA citizens to vote for Joe Biden, did not convince me that Joe has the energy and stamina to resist the extreme pressure he will get from the progressive caucus of the US Congress. About 20% of the members of the US Senate and House belong to this caucus, and their unified voice is very energetic, persistent, loud, and dismissive of opposition voices. I believe the extreme left policies they espouse will be harmful to the USA values and its world allies.

However, now that we have President-elect Joe Biden, I do think by moving to the center for governance there is a chance for him to play a major role in unifying the people of our country, conservative and liberal.

Former President Bill Clinton is a perfect role model for Joe to follow to the center-governance position.

If soon to be President Joe Biden doesn’t move to the center, I have no doubt it will be four more contentious years like we’ve had for the past four. The voting numbers in this recent election clearly show the people of this great nation currently are split right down the middle. How long that can last without a BIG CLEAR BREAK forming is anybody’s guess.

One of my favorite verses is appropriate here for soon to be President Joe Biden:

but those who hope in the Lord
will renew their strength.
They will soar on wings like eagles;
they will run and not grow weary,
they will walk and not be faint.

Isaiah 40:31, The Holy Bible

I do believe Joe Biden is a person of faith, so I’m confident he understands the depth of meaning this Bible verse has for him.

Godspeed, Joe Biden!

We the citizens of the US, conservative and liberal, will be paying close attention to your Presidential actions for the upcoming term and offering our constructive accolades and criticism as earned by you and your cabinet.

Joe, don’t you just love a democratic republic? Actually, I know you do, since you have dedicated your life to this country.

No matter what our disagreements may be politically, economically, socially, and religiously; thank you for your willingness to spend your entire adult life in service to our great country, The United States of America.

Separation of Church and State in Election Year 2020

A long-time, very close friend of mine in a recent FB post reminded us how important separation of church and state really is. Personally, I’m a big believer in this tenet.

History has taught us that the church and state do not mix well without abuse and corruption surfacing. It doesn’t matter whether it’s the church or the state in the power seat. However, as the fallen human race, we do not retain the nuances of this lesson very long.

My friend refers to an example of church and state collusion during the early few decades of the CE time period. During that time, Jesus walked the earth and his presence, teachings, and actions threatened the Jewish establishment’s (church) power position carved out by the top ruling authority, the Roman empire (state).

Here are my friend’s questions that bring elements of the ancient Jewish-Roman relationship into the USA 2020 election year: “Is this [ancient] biblical pattern repeating itself today? If so, where do you see it? Does the hope of changing laws or Supreme Court interpretations to align them more closely to a particular understanding of biblical ideals justify the collusion of any segment of Christianity with any political party?”

While I think this was presented as a rhetorical question, I’ll answer it anyway. My short answer to this question is there is no justification for “any segment of Christianity [church: ‘body of Christ’] colluding with any political party [state].” Period!

However, as a practical matter, I personally don’t feel that our current day church-political leaders entanglement rises to the level of collusion.

Collusion is defined as “secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy among multiple parties, especially for the purpose of cheating or deceiving others.”

I just don’t see this being a shadow agenda of a segment of the Christian church and a set of political leaders today. It is out in the open, whereas, in ancient times, I suspect it wasn’t so much.

This is where I think the church leaders today get derailed.

I believe the primary role of a Christian leader/teacher/pastor is to make sure his/her congregants are equipped to make Holy Spirit led choices in all walks of life. This is accomplished by teaching them who Jesus is at a deep, spiritual level. Pastors taking valuable time away from this mission to influence their congregants and others to vote for a particular Presidential candidate is a big no-no for me.

When church congregants learn to lean on the Spirit of Jesus within them, they will each be empowered to make her/his own determination about the alignment of a Presidential candidate’s values and policies with the congregant’s internal Biblical values.

In an authentic democratic society, a vote for any candidate should always be “one person one vote” weighing the balance of the values and policies of each candidate with the individual voter’s values.

Realizing, of course, there is no candidate nor voter who is set apart from the fallen human race, therefore, none is perfect.

Is the Jewish-Roman pattern repeating itself today?

Yes. Shock, shock that this could happen within the fallen human race.

I see it across the spectrum of Christian church leaders – liberal, moderate, and conservative.

Conservative

I see the pattern mentioned by my friend with many conservative Christian leaders (church) supporting President Trump (state). Notwithstanding his character (which is not so Biblical all the time), many conservative pastors support President Trump’s goal to seat Supreme Court Justices who are constitutional originalists cut from the pattern of Justice Antonin Scalia.

I can put a few names to the conservative church leaders supporting President Trump in spite of his style, yet loving his Supreme Court Justice nominations: Pastor Robert Jeffress, FBC, Dallas, and Rev. Franklin Graham, Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

However, I just don’t see this as segmental collusion. I see it as individual church leaders losing sight of two of their primary objectives — teaching individual souls about The Great Commandment and Great Commission of Jesus.

Go figure!

One would think Franklin Graham learned better from the mistake his father Billy Graham made and acknowledged when he became a close confidant with President Richard Nixon. This ended badly when a few of their ignoble conversations were exposed on the Watergate tapes.

Moderate-Liberal

I’ll call out just one example of many I’ve observed.

The organization identified as Vote Common Good for Biden has collected signatures from 1600 moderate-liberal church leaders to endorse the Biden-Harris ticket.

Church leaders cannot endorse candidates for the Presidency from their pulpits without risk of losing the 501(c)(3) tax exempt status for their congregants’ tithes and offerings. That pesky ole Senator Lyndon Johnson Amendment circa 1954.

So, in my opinion, those 1600 church leaders have by their actions leveraged a deceptive, end-around maneuver using Vote Common Good, a 501(c)(4) organization, to act as a “pulpit surrogate” soliciting their congregants votes for Biden-Harris. A 501(c)(4) is a social welfare nonprofit organization with tax exempt status that is not passed through to its donors.

It seems clear to me from news media coverage over the past four years, this is an action by moderate-liberal Christian church leaders endorsing a presidential candidate whose ideology aligns closely with their Christian Biblical ideals on issues such as abortion, social justice, immigration, racism, and climate change.

My Vision for All Church Leaders

I long for the day Christian church leaders enter the Post-Jerry Falwell/Moral Majority era (1979 start date) of church and politics entanglement.

To me, that means getting back to Christian basics by focusing on teaching their congregants the nuances of our Lord Jesus’ Great Commandment (Matthew 22:37-40) and Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20) rather than political activism.

In a nutshell, such an education consists of learning to “love God, and love [and help] your neighbors as yourself” and “tell others about the love and eternal plan of Jesus for all mankind.”

Then, let the congregants decide on their own which candidate/platform matches their heart-mind-soul interpretation of Biblical values. Each individual vote can then be cast with the individual voter being led by the Holy Spirit, not church leaders.

In my opinion, these church leaders have much more important things to do in the Kingdom of God on earth than getting “down and dirty” in the quagmire of politics.

Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)

In one of many posts on Facebook, a friend of mine builds the case that (1) anthropogenic (man caused) global warming (AGW) has materially damaged the earth and human beings quality of life on earth, and (2) Trump has reversed the Obama environmental regulations on fossil fuels that were working well to mitigate the severity of that damage.

My friend also cites one result of this reversal is the increase in property damage costs and loss of life as the total count of USA tropical storms and hurricanes surpasses 18 in one year. This has occurred during 5 of the past 20 years, with this year’s hurricane season (2020) being one of the worst.

It has been much reported, reviewed and contested that 97% of tens of thousands of PhD climate scientists in the world in their peer-reviewed papers either agreed that AGW damage from burning fossil fuels is significant or acknowledged the reality of AGW but did not explicitly in writing quantify its significance in raising the earth’s surface temperature.

This implies that 3% of the climate scientists rejected the significance of AGW outright.

It is left to the reader’s intuition and personal analysis to determine how close to reality the 97% figure is, since the scientists who didn’t overtly take a pro or con position on AGW in his/her paper were counted as being pro.

Some long-time environmental/energy journalists have researched these peer-reviewed papers and believe reality is the 97% figure is closer to 81% .

Notwithstanding, it’s safe to say there is enough agreement among climate scientists that AGW is the primary cause of the earth’s average surface temperature (AST) increasing inordinately to warrant taking a close look at what adjustments need to be made to the current President Trump EPA regulations.

The vaporized chemical compound in the atmosphere identified as one of the largest contributors to AGW is carbon dioxide (CO2) produced when man ignites fossil fuels. These vaporized molecules are suspended in the outer layer of the earth’s atmosphere:

“The 2-degree increase in global [earth’s] average surface temperature (AST) that has occurred since the pre-industrial era might seem small, but it means a significant increase in accumulated heat.” ClimateWatch Magazine, 8-14-2020

The climate scientist authors mentioned have not reported on how much of the average surface temperature increase can be attributed to each of (1) AGW components such as CO2 from humankind burning fossil fuels; (2) the earth’s other natural greenhouse gases such as nitrogen oxide/N2O, water vapor/H2O, methane/CH4, and ozone/O3; and (3) long-cycle natural (earth) effects.

One such long-cycle natural effect of freezing/warming the earth’s surface results from the Milankovitch effect which is the hypothesis that “variations in eccentricity, axial tilt, and precession [of the earth in its orbit around the sun] resulted in cyclical variation in the solar radiation reaching the Earth, and that this orbital forcing strongly influenced climatic changes on the earth.”

For instance, in the 4 billion years of the earth’s existence, scientific evidence discovered in modern times from drill-hole glacier samples supports the occurrence of five (5) cooling/warming cycles of severe glaciation and eventual subsequent warming, i.e., Ice Ages.

Some environment extremists, both social activists and politicians, have misused science facts to draw conclusions that fit their scare-tactics narrative rather than the actual scientific evidence.

“Few have underscored the threat more than student climate activist Greta Thunberg [Swedish teenage activist who emotionally lectured the 2018 UN Climate Change Conference] and Green New Deal sponsor US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The latter said, “The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.” Says Thunberg in her new book, “Around 2030 we will be in a position to set off an irreversible chain reaction beyond human control that will lead to the end of our civilization as we know it.”

However, the 97% climate scientists who believe AGW is a reality take a more rational view:

“No credible scientific body has ever said climate change threatens the collapse of civilization much less the extinction of the human species.Michael Shellenberger, long-time environmental journalist/activist https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/11/25/why-everything-they-say-about-climate-change-is-wrong/#28229dec12d6

Nevertheless, it is rare to find a liberal or conservative who has seriously thought about global warming and AGW’s part in it who disputes that it is occurring. It is as simple as taking accurate earth surface temperature measurements over time and truthfully recording them for historical tracking purposes. Then, do the averaging math. This has been done at least from the the pre-industrial era starting in the mid 1700s until current time.

The main question at this point in history is what can be done to reduce fossil fuel’s ignition impact on the environment without “throwing the baby (humankind’s socioeconomic health) out with the bathwater (total elimination of fossil fuel utilization at all human costs in an attempt to preserve healthy air and water in the earth’s atmosphere and dramatically reduce AGW causing CO2).”

I have confidence that we as a civilization can come up with a solution that supports human flourishing and the sustainability of the earth’s environment without “throwing out the baby with the bathwater.”

We have done similar things in the past, so we have lessons learned.

When more than two dozen countries undertook in 1989 to fix the ozone hole over Antarctica, they began replacing chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) in refrigerators, air conditioners and hair spray. Associated Press, Washington, 2006

It worked. Sort of.

But they had little idea that using other gases that contain chlorine or fluorine instead, e.g., hydrochlorofluorocarbon – HCFC, also would contribute greatly to global warming. Associated Press, Washington, 2006

Which leads us to the obvious question, “What will be the unintended negative consequences on the environment if humankind can and does actually determine how to anthropogenically manipulate the levels of natural greenhouse gases in the earth’s atmosphere?”

Actually, it is very impressive how God’s nature heals itself when left to its own devices.

Remember the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill when an offshore oil and gas drilling rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. The flow line from the well at the bottom of the Gulf to the rig platform for storage was ruptured and immediately started spewing oil and gas into the Gulf’s deep waters.

The hydrocarbon eating microbes .5 miles deep in the Gulf had the bulk of the oil and gas spilled cleaned up within several months — 200,000 tons worth.

Very impressive.

Notwithstanding, I’m on board for constantly reviewing and sensibly and incrementally tightening EPA regulations if hard scientific data provide a strong correlation between a proposed regulation change and a direct reduction in undesirable anthropogenic global warming levels.

For a start in our review, let’s consider my friend’s list with his comments of the Trump administration EPA regulation changes and my comments in the braces [ ]:

1. The EPA let’s polluters police themselves, “because of the pandemic.” That’ll work…Duh. [Actually, in this case there is no EPA regulation change, just a temporary suspension of EPA inspector visits during Covid19. Fines are still being issued by the EPA to corporate violators, so this temporary honor system must be working somewhat. Are some violators getting away with malfeasance? After all, we live with the human condition which makes us all susceptible to temptations of sin, so probably, yes. I spent 45 years as a technology professional in large computer corporations. Hewlett Packard (HP) was one of those corporations. I worked for HP between 1982 and 2006. HP was a very early leader among large corporations using Green manufacturing principles. I have faith that the significant majority of large corporations in America desire to be good citizens when it comes to protecting the environment. Altruism is not the biggest part of the reason, but it was a significant part for HP. Another reason, it is just good business and increases a company’s market potential.]

2. Rolled back Obama’s carbon emissions, allowing nearly a billion tons more of carbon emissions for the cars’ life than the Obama standards.

3. Weakening mercury and air toxics standards. We breathe that, don’t we?

4. Selling the rights to drill nearly 400,000 offshore acres in the Gulf of Mexico. [President Obama also did this in 2015; actually, President Trump allowed 10s of millions of offshore acres to be leased]

5. Replacing Obama’s clean power plan, again, accelerating the climate crisis.

6. Gutting the clean water act. We drink that, don’t we?

7. Neutering the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [enacted by the US Congress in 1970 when President Nixon, a Republican, was in office and used as a model for over 100 nations around the world.]

8. Silencing scientists. [This is a stretch. The scientists in the EPA under President Obama felt as if they had been silenced by President Trump, but the reality is the projects they had been working on to rapidly and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions were discontinued. That’s they way it works when a “new sheriff is in town in Washington D.C.” It happens every time a new President is elected. Every career professional in D.C. should understand this is a possibility with a newly elected administration. For a federal government career professional, it is naïve to think otherwise.]

Investigating this list does make me think that President Trump’s administration overcorrected President Obama’s EPA regulations by weighting them heavily in the conservative-economics direction. There needs to be a better balance of EPA regulations than we have today.

But, I also believe prior to President Trump’s overcorrection, President Obama’s EPA had eight years of overreach by weighting its regulations inordinately in the liberal-social direction.

My position on this should be no surprise to anyone who knows me today. I am a self-described independent centrist. My preference is balance in everything, not extremes.

If we could get liberals and conservatives in the US Congress to quit vilifying each other long enough to have truthful discussions about root-cause/effect-mitigation incremental solutions, we might actually get back to a more balanced set of EPA regulations to protect the earth’s environment.

Before that can happen, trust must be rebuilt between these two groups. That’s a heavy lift indeed.

I actually do believe it is possible, but these two groups first must stop acting like petulant kids and be the intelligent adults I believe them to be.

Ultimately, I believe in order to flourish in general and protect the environment specifically, the World/USA human civilization must achieve a solution for AGW that incorporates appropriately weighted consideration for all four major systems of our society – social, economic, religious, and political.

Science is a key substrate that supports all four major systems, NOT a standalone system that acts as the sole arbiter for any of civilization’s challenges.

I believe our society today has been “trained” by partisan politicians with an agenda to consider science as King. Obviously, science is a very important component when deliberating EPA regulations. In fact, in my opinion, it is the foundation upon which viable solutions are built.

But, we cannot as a thriving, healthy, human civilization rely only on science and ignore the negative impact the EPA regulations have on all the societal systems: economic, social, religious, and political.

Common sense and balance are imperatives.

Russian Friendship? + Decimation of Obama EPA Regulations?

A while back a friend of mine posted two insightful questions about President Trump on his Facebook page. Here is my response.

What is the end game with the [Trump] Russian friendship?

My Friend’s FB Post – Part 1: “I don’t know what you think, but one day we [USA] are going to need allies. The odd part, is at the same time he [President Trump] is dissing our allies, he is cozying up with the worst scum [Russia and Vladimir Putin] the world has to offer. What could be the end game here? Why? Russia wants to take America down. Can someone enlighten me?”

I personally believe this question has a simple answer conflated from three quotes:

  1. Being a person of the Christian faith, I always take seriously everything Jesus said while he taught us here on earth. Here is one quote that applies directly to the USA and Russia relationship, “…love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you.” [Just to digress from Russia for a moment, my most favorite quote from Jesus is, “Love God, and love your neighbor as yourself.” Jesus later was asked and answered that neighbor means all human beings on the earth].
  2. Godfather II quote, “Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.”
  3. President Ronald Reagan, “Trust but verify.”

Wow, what an eclectic group of sources!

Melding these three ideas yields a potent strategy for President Trump to be friendly with a USA enemy, in this case Russia, and simultaneously be super diligent against Russian malfeasance.

If anyone has an interest in confirming whether or not President Trump is nefariously “cozying up” to Vladimir Putin as my friend implies, please take a look at a conservative magazine point of view of how tough President Trump has been on Vladimir Putin and Russia — July 25, 2020, Townhall.com article,

https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffdavidson/2020/07/25/trump-continues-to-be-exceedingly-tough-on-russia-n2572999

Of course, one who has liberal leanings will likely consider this article to be an example of “massaging the truth,” which I call spin. Spin means conflating sound-bites and other out-of-context information to underpin a tribe’s narrative whether the conflated thought is fact or fiction.

Unfortunately, in my opinion, a significant percentage of politicians today in both major political parties in the USA consider this to be standard operating procedure. 

A quote from the link above sums it up nicely by saying, “In all, as a Brookings Institute analysis revealed, the Trump administration has enacted more than 50 sanctions or policy actions on Russia, many being severe, from May 15, 2017 – four months after Trump took office – to the present day. ”

Whether viewed through a liberal or a conservative lens, the 50 sanctions during President Trump’s first term in office are a matter of public record.

Why decimate Obama’s environmental regulations?

My Friend’s FB Post – Part 2: Trump has decimated [President Obama’s] environmental regulations. What is [President Trump’s] end game here? [Is it] the fossil fuel industry [e.g., Exxon], one of the most profitable businesses the world has ever known, needs more profits?”

I believe for President Trump this question also has a simple answer expressed clearly by the following quote in 1992 from James Carville, “It’s the economy, stupid!”

[I don’t like the word stupid and rarely use it, but used in this general sense and not directed at an individual, it effectively drives home the point very well. When James Carville, a colorful character nicknamed the Ragin’ Cajun from Louisiana, coined this phrase in 1992, he was then-Arkansas governor Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign lead strategist. Obviously, he was very good at his job, since President Clinton defeated the incumbent President George H.W. Bush in 1992, preventing him from serving a second term as president. The reason, although the 8 month recession that started in 1990 had ended in March 1991, unemployment recovery was very sluggish and carried through to the Presidential election in November 1992. GHW Bush lost, with the sluggish economy plummeting the incumbent’s voter approval rating from 89% after winning the Persian Gulf War in 1991 to 46% during the 1992 election year.]

Therefore in my opinion, the answer to my friend’s question is not “the fossil fuel industry…needs more profits” per se, rather, it is that President Trump’s larger than life ego needs bragging rights produced by a “biggest ever” USA Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

At the same time, I do believe Trump thinks a super strong economy provides the best of all worlds for the people of the USA. There is no doubt in my mind that President Trump loves his country and the people in it.

Of course, it would be disingenuous of me to suggest there is no connection to oil, since the Oil sector of the Energy industry is the biggest contributor to the GDP when the direct and indirect effects are combined.

Expanding that thought, all other business Industries/Sectors depend on energy to “fuel” their businesses. Without low-cost energy being available, the operations costs would just be too exorbitant to steadily expand the products and services being provided by these companies.

Without low energy costs, the result is a lower GDP for the USA.

On Trump’s watch, not going to happen without a fight! [Of course, the COVID 19 pandemic has had a debilitating impact on the growth of the USA economy.]

President Trump is a businessman first and a politician next. In my opinion, his obsession with the economy-GDP does not mean President Trump has no personal concern for people, the earth’s environment, and the well-being and sustainability of both.

Of course, virtually all Democrats, most disenfranchised Republicans, and the mainstream media believe he has a hard heart toward everyone and everything but himself and his family. Oh! And the USA economy.

I personally think he is better than that, although his “what you see is what you get” answers to the press and tweets rarely reflect it. He obviously is a fighter, no holds barred. This is unfortunate for us who believe absent his style, he is much better than that.

In my opinion, President Trump believes strongly in a combination of President Reagan’s “trickle down economics” and President Kennedy’s “a rising tide lifts all boats.” [President John F. Kennedy used this quote with permission from its author, a regional chamber of commerce, The New England Council in a 1963 speech about the economy.]

Strange at it sounds to my liberal friends, since President Trump’s extemporaneous words generally are at odds with his subsequent and generally thoughtful actions, I really do think he sincerely cares for the people of the USA, especially the working class, no matter their race or ethnicity.

In my opinion, he is just not very good at how he mixes fact and fiction with seriousness, contemplation, subtle humor, and sarcasm in his day-to-day vernacular, i.e., Trump-speak. It drives liberals crazy. Me too, until I learned how to decipher Trump-speak.

Mainstream media and Democrats take an alternative route to dealing with Trump-speak. Their choice is to take snippets out of context, strip them of humor and sarcasm, and use their version of Trump-speak to damage President Trump politically and personally, make fun of him, and call him a liar.

Just days after the Trump inauguration, the Washington Post assigned a sizable team of journalists fulltime to watch President Trump’s every move 24 hours a day and catch him in “false” statements. As a result, by July 2020 this team had counted a cumulative total of what they consider to be 20,000 false statements from President Trump.

What a waste of journalistic resources. I’m certain I can name many politicians, Democrat and Republican, and media commentators if under the same scrutiny would have at least a comparable count of false statements.

Euphemistically, this is called spin, party narrative, or talking points in political circles, which unfortunately, are all acceptable in today’s politics and most communications outlets.

In spite of this extreme attempt to discredit President Trump, President Trump’s solid base of supporters (~1/3rd of registered voters in USA) strongly reflects the fact they care for him.

As to my friend’s reference to Trump’s decimation of Obama’s environment regulations, there is evidence that President Obama’s EPA regulations and tax structure had a dramatic negative impact on USA businesses and needed to be adjusted.

I personally do believe that many of President Obama’s EPA regulations were necessary, but they overreached. I also believe that President Trump’s corrections to those regulations were an overcorrection.

I believe there is now a need to bring the current EPA regulations to more of a balance between these two extremes.

In summary, President Trump’s ego booster has been transformed from his personal wealth and prowess as a businessman in the private sector to the USA economy (GDP) being the best and largest in the world, by far, in all of its history and glory, and in the universe if that can be measured!!!

In the big scheme of things, that is mostly a good thing for all Americans, people of other countries doing business with the USA, immigrants from other countries migrating to the USA, and governments and citizens of other countries of the world receiving support, relief, development, and national security dollars from the USA.

Today, the USA is that “rising tide” in the world that “lifts all boats.” For those who don’t believe that about the USA, I think they are ignoring reality.

From the time of the 2016 election, I have recognized and do still recognize Donald Trump as my President, notwithstanding his style.

If he would just stop his confrontational rudeness and tweets with the Democrats, the media, and those who disagree with him; I believe our country could move forward much more unified, which is what we desperately need.

At the macro level, I do have general agreement with at least 50% of President Trump’s centrist-conservative policies as they relate to all the major societal systems of the USA: social, economic, religious, and political (governance).

That percentage number is just built into an independent centrist’s way of thinking, regardless of which major party is in the US White House.

I pray regularly for the success of President Trump, his VP and cabinet, the US legislative and judicial leaders, our country and its people, and all people and countries of the world.

My Answer to Robert Redford

Robert Redford, I like your movies and you seem like a nice guy.

However, I have material disagreements with the main premise and supporting arguments in your article attached to the end of this blog post.

My summation of the central theme of your article is that Joe Biden is the reincarnation of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) and therefore deserves our vote in 2020. Otherwise, we get President Donald Trump in the Oval Office for another four years who is Satan incarnate and literally has and will continue to decimate the will of the American people and their political (government), social (cultural), economic, and religious systems.

Robert, did I get that about right?

I feel your passion, caring, pain, and sincerity, which I appreciate.

I just don’t agree with your main point and many of your supporting arguments. But, I do respect your right to express your opinion, just as each of us human beings has that right.

Actually, I do agree with a few of your points.

And, we may even have some common ground in our points of disagreement on which to compromise. If we just take the time to listen to each other’s arguments, really listen, and then use reason rather than emotion to control our thinking, that will be a big step in the right direction.

If we citizens of the USA are all willing to listen respectfully to each others’ arguments, I believe we can become united again. Of course, we’ll never agree on every issue. But, it is the striving together, respecting others’ opinions, willingness to compromise, and willingness to agreeably disagree that ultimately produce an outcome that is the will of the majority and at least recognized by the minority as a legitimate outcome.

Now that is a healthy democracy.

A healthy democracy is the solid foundation on which this great country has been built. However, as you described in your article, we are not really a healthy democracy today. In my opinion, in the past three decades, we the people of the USA have been inching toward a tipping point that divides us seriously enough to materially and permanently damage the core values of the USA.

Robert, you expressed hope for the future in your article, “I see much of the country beginning to reunite again, the way it did when I was a kid. You can see it in the peaceful protests of the past several weeks.”

You wrote your article over a month ago (July 8, 2020), so I’m curious if today you still have that same attitude about “peaceful protests” as agents of unification. I ask this in light of the nightly (August 19, 2020) riots, burnings, and destruction of property and life in the USA’s largest cities by the night-time supporters of the day-time peaceful protestors.

Notwithstanding, I appreciate your hope for a positive outcome for the country we both love based on your recollection of the feeling you had for President FDR’s moral compass and strong leadership abilities, “For me, the power of FDR’s example is what it says about the kind of leadership America needs — and can have again, if we choose it.

You seem to think we as a nation are getting close to a turning point to peace and prosperity for all if only we vote for Joe Biden as USA President.

It is at this point in our “conversation” that I believe you and I start to disagree on the solution for the sickness that we currently have in the USA today.

Twelve years ago I could have seriously considered your request to vote for Joe Biden as President.

Not today.

Twelve years ago (2008), Joe was a seasoned, thirty-six year US Senator with a strong and vigorous voice of his own. For those years as a US Senator, Joe was a centrist Democrat who used his voice and position to build up our nation for all citizens and legal residents.

However, in my opinion over these past years as Vice President to Barack Obama’s Presidency and then as a candidate for the Presidency, Joe has been forced by the radical left of the Democrat party to support their complete platform or “else” — e.g., abortion on demand; annual payment of USA citizens’ tax dollars to Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the USA (345,000+ abortions in 2018); full funding for the Green New Deal; open borders immigration policy leanings; reinstatement of President Obama-era extreme business regulations; dramatic increase in taxes on private businesses of all sizes; wealth redistribution via large tax increases on wealthy individuals; dramatic reduction in financial support for already underfunded law enforcement departments fighting crime and insuring citizens’ safety via community policing; redirection of the funds cut from police budgets to community services other than police; no financial support for parental choices for their children other than public education; Bernie Sander’s free college for everyone; mandated federal buy-back for certain private owner guns (I don’t even own a gun, but I don’t think this is constitutional); governmental (we the people) reparation payments to descendants of black slaves in the USA; in my opinion, before election day Joe Biden will be forced to support Bernie Sander’s version of governmental, single-payer, universal health care in the USA; and the list goes on.

While I support the general intent of some of these planks in the Joe Biden platform, they would have to be moderated considerably for me to support them. Others such as Abortion on Demand and paying for abortions with tax dollars from USA citizens opposing abortion are DOA for me.

Joe Biden just doesn’t impress me today as having the strength, vigor, endurance, and passion that he had in years past to be able to push-back on the growing number of radical Democrats on policy decisions.

At heart, I think Joe probably is still a centrist and thinks he can regain his voice if elected. However, I think his time has passed to be able to do that.

My solution and hope is in the Silent Majority of years past – conservative, independent, and liberal. I think it is still there, just silent at this time as is the norm for this group. It needs to find its voice again! Soon!

Today, I think the Silent Majority of the citizens of the USA must make a significant attitude adjustment. We all need to earnestly focus on “uniting and uplifting” each other, not literally destroying each other socially, financially, and politically. Current day social media platforms such as Twitter seem to be the choice du jour of “verbal weapons of destruction” in the USA (and world).

Sincere efforts to “unite and uplift” must be accomplished across tribal boundaries, not just within one’s own tribe as is the case today.

Robert, you made reference in your article to FDR’s ability to “unite and uplift.”

You also stated that President Trump has been and is doing just the opposite, i.e., “Instead of words that uplift and unite, we hear words [from President Trump] that inflame and divide.” You also stated that “Instead of a president who says we’re all in it together, we have a president who’s in it for himself.

On the one hand, I agree President Trump has a huge ego that requires a lot of feeding, but I don’t view him that much differently from the typical celebrity politician today in both political parties. I believe this modern day version of a politician has its roots firmly planted twenty-eight years ago in Bill Clinton, who by the way I think was a good President, notwithstanding his exhaustively chronicled character flaws.

With steadfast care and cultivation, this current version of politician, as compared to statespersons of years past, is at a point where too many politicians care more about winning the next election cycle and fundraising millions of dollars for election campaigns than doing the work of the people.

Every President has his own (one day, her own) idiosyncrasies, ego, and failings. Lord knows President Trump has his and they are very well chronicled over the past several decades.

I don’t like his tweets, the way he plays fast and loose with the truth, and the way he rudely treats people who disagree with him.

I certainly don’t like the way he mocks and makes fun of people who irritate him.

I’m really just totally exhausted with his huge ego that publicly declares everything accomplished by his Presidency to be the biggest and best by far in the history of the whole universe.

Wow! That describes a sizable number of the politicians in Washington D.C. today in both parties after twenty-eight years of steady devolvement from the average statespersons of years past.

On the other hand, I do like the way President Trump daily gives direct and impromptu answers to real-time questions from news reporters rather than answers from a list of tribal talking points that don’t even attempt to answer the questions asked.

What you see is what you get with President Trump.

I do like that he brought business skills, honed over many decades, to the Oval Office so he doesn’t just address every problem from a political perspective.

I like that he is not afraid in a deal negotiation to ask for what he thinks is best for our country. He then seriously considers all counter-offers with input from his cabinet/advisors. And then, he compromises with the parties in the deal by making the best deal he can for the country.

In this give and take manner, each party (US Citizens, US White House, US House, US Senate, foreign countries) in the deal should be able to walk away with something positive from the final deal.

Of course, every party of the deal must decide if the “price” paid to close the deal is worth the return. If it is not, I like that President Trump is willing to walk away from the deal and try again later.

He is a natural politician, so not much to say here other than he didn’t require a steep learning curve on politics when he got to the Oval Office.

On how the USA government operates, that’s a different story. He is still a work in progress on that front.

I do like that President Trump runs the presidency like a CEO — hires good people, listens to everyone, after listening makes a rational decision based on the input received, and follows through with prompt action.

I don’t agree with all of his policy decisions, but in general, I like the conservative thinking that he has revitalized in Washington D.C. after eight years of President Obama’s politically progressive policies.

To make the best decisions, bipartisan input from both the liberal and the conservative points of view need to be in the mix. Not a lot of that going on today, nor was it in President Obama’s time in the Oval Office, just a different political party in power. Same pettiness in congressional oversight and policy negotiations.

Unfortunately, over the past three decades or so, bipartisanship has been a rarity.

What an understatement.

Robert, one other point about “…[President Trump is] a president who’s in it for himself

My observation over the past three years is that President Trump has a big heart for the USA nation itself and its people, e.g., working-class people, regardless of color or ethnicity.

After all, he was raised as a very young man with extensive life skills and values materially shaped by the working men and women on his father’s construction crews in Queens, NYC.

At age twenty-five, he became President of his father’s construction and real estate company, renamed it The Trump Organization, and continued his life skills education by managing construction projects and crews in Queens, Brooklyn, and Manhattan.

Through these experiences he obviously honed his life skills in the rough and tumble world of labor union bosses, construction crew skilled workers, Teamster union workers, construction supplies vendors, city leaders and inspectors, and on and on, as well as high finance capital bankers and business deal makers.

It’s virtually impossible to “handle with kid gloves” the people working to complete a construction project in New York City if you want the project to be on-schedule and on-budget.

The end result is the President Donald Trump we see today, which came as a cataclysmic shock to the faux political diplomacy of Washington D.C.

Just imagine, someone who says what he is thinking and actually does what he says he is going to do.

Now, that’s radical!

He is not a religious giant, but then again, who really is?

We are a fallen human race, but because of the grace and forgiveness from God who is the creator of the perfect moral compass, we can all get up after a fall and keep moving forward with God in our hearts as our moral compass.

Robert, I have little doubt that you vehemently disagree with all the positive comments I have just made about President Trump and his Presidential team.

In fact, I suspect you might have some very colorful words to describe how you feel about my comments. That’s okay, since we both believe in free choice and free speech. I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but I’m pretty sure you feel the same as I about free speech.

On that note, I do agree with your comment “President Donald Trump didn’t create all of our divisions as Americans.”

I think this current wave of political distrust between the Democrat and Republican parties began with Bill Clinton’s Presidency and Speaker Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America. This happened after Republicans wrestled the majority from Bill Clinton and the Democrats in the US House of Representatives in 1994, two years into Clinton’s presidency.

Strangely enough, Bill and Newt actually did a decent job of getting the House of Representatives and the White House to work together to accomplish some good things for the people.

But the divisiveness and infighting between political parties in our USA has intensified and calcified over the years to its current state of distrust, deceit, and hate between people of the two major USA political parties.

I have a different viewpoint than you on the rest of your comment about divisiveness, “But he [President Donald Trump] has found every fault line in America and wrenched them wide open.

Your statement leaves me thinking you believe that President Donald Trump’s time in the White House is more divisive and tumultuous than was President Obama’s eight years in office.

I’m not buying it.

I’ve followed both presidents very closely, and they are equally divisive. Just with two different political parties in power at different times, with different agendas, and different sets of supporters, one liberal and one conservative.

Of course, our difference of opinion is largely predicated on your political viewpoint being left or possibly left-center and mine being center-right with a little center-left on social issues. Obviously, you align more closely with Obama’s line of thinking on policy and I align more with Trump’s.

Robert, as to style points, I’m sure you’ll be pleased to know I think President Obama wins that one hands down.

As I stated earlier, I think this current-era of extreme divisiveness started in 1992 when President Clinton and Newt Gingrich took office, advanced a little through George W. Bush’s term as president, became much more divisive during President Obama’s time in office, and continued on the same trajectory to worsen and harden with President Trump.

No one person is to blame for the sorry state of affairs we find today politically in the USA. There is plenty of blame to spread across the two major political parties and their constituents (us) in our great country.

I don’t like President Obama’s elitist attitude toward working class people. His on-air statement when he thought he was off-air was a divisive as it gets: “They [working class] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

I don’t like that President Obama thinks he has all the answers, and if you don’t agree, he makes fun of you. I agree he is smart, accomplished, and articulate; but really, nobody has ALL the answers.

I do like that he doesn’t tweet that much, generally uses good manners in delivering his public comments to and about others, and seems to be a good husband and father.

But I personally believe he materially contributed to the division of the country along political and racial lines just as much as any president in my lifetime, including President Trump.

Being the first black President, which is a very heavy lift, I cut President Obama some slack on the racial division front.

I am extremely happy and thankful that the USA citizenry finally elected the first black USA president. In my mind, that was a huge, positive step forward for our country.

In my lifetime, we the people of the USA have been much healthier than we are now as a democracy, and I’m confident we’ll keep working on getting better in the future.

So, Robert, with respect and after deep reflection reading your article and doing my independent research, I say “Thanks, but no thanks” on your invitation to vote for Joe Biden in November 2020.

If President Trump and Joe Biden are the only choices on voting day, I’ll be voting for President Trump.

If there are other viable candidates that unexpectedly surface, I’ll seriously consider them before casting my vote.

Attachment

Robert Redford post, July 8, 2020, various media outlets

“I have a lot of vivid memories of growing up in Los Angeles in the 1940s, but one in particular keeps coming back to me today, in these troubled times. I remember sitting with my parents — actually, my parents were sitting; I was lying on the floor, the way kids do — and listening to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt talking to us over the radio. He was talking to the nation, of course, not just to us, but it sure felt that way. He was personal and informal, like he was right there in our living room.

I was too young to follow much of what he was saying — something about World War II. But what I did understand was that this was a man who cared about our well-being. I felt calmed by his voice. It was a voice of authority and, at the same time, empathy. Americans were facing a common enemy — fascism — and FDR gave us the sense that we were all in it together. Even kids like me had a role to play: participating in paper drives, collecting scrap metal, doing whatever we could do. That’s what it was like to have a president with a strong moral compass. It guided him, gave him direction, and helped him point the nation toward a better future.

Maybe this strikes you as simple nostalgia. I’ve got a touch of that, sure (who doesn’t right now?). But I’m too focused on the future to sit around pining for the old days. For me, the power of FDR’s example is what it says about the kind of leadership America needs — and can have again, if we choose it.

But one thing is clear: Instead of a moral compass in the Oval Office, there’s a moral vacuum. Instead of a president who says we’re all in it together, we have a president who’s in it for himself. Instead of words that uplift and unite, we hear words that inflame and divide. When someone retweets (and then deletes) a video of a supporter shouting “white power” or calls journalists “enemies of the state,” when he turns a lifesaving mask against contagion into a weapon in a culture war, when he orders the police and the military to tear gas peaceful protestors so he can wave a Bible at the cameras, he sacrifices — again and again — any claim to moral authority.

Another four years of this would degrade our country beyond repair. The toll it’s taking is almost biblical: fires and floods, a literal plague upon the land, an eruption of hatred that’s being summoned and harnessed, by a leader with no conscience or shame. Four more years would accelerate our slide toward autocracy. It would be taken as free license to punish more so-called “traitors” and wage more petty vendettas — with the full weight of the Justice Department behind them. Four more years would mean open season on our environmental laws. The assault has been ongoing — it started with abandoning the historic agreement that the world made in Paris to combat climate change, and continued, just last month, with using the pandemic as cover to let industries pollute as they see fit. Four more years would bring untold damage to our planet — our home.

America is still a world power. But in the past four years, it has lost its place as a world leader. A second term would embolden enemies and further weaken our standing with our friends.

When and how did the United States of America become the Divided States of America? Polarization, of course, has deep roots and many sources.

Without a moral compass in the Oval Office, our country is dangerously adrift. But this November, we can choose another direction. This November, unity and empathy are on the ballot. Experience and intelligence are on the ballot. Joe Biden is on the ballot, and I’m confident he will bring these qualities back to White House.

I don’t make a practice of publicly announcing my vote. But this election year is different. And I believe Biden was made for this moment. Biden leads with his heart. I don’t mean that in a soft and sentimental way. I’m talking about a fierce compassion — the kind that fuels him, that drives him to fight against racial and economic injustice, that won’t let him rest while people are struggling.

As FDR showed, empathy and ethics are not signs of weakness. They’re signs of strength. I think Americans are coming back to that view. Despite Trump — despite his daily efforts to divide us — I see much of the country beginning to reunite again, the way it did when I was a kid. You can see it in the peaceful protests of the past several weeks — Americans of all races and classes coming together to fight against racism. You can see it the ways that communities are pulling together in the face of this pandemic, even if the White House has left them to fend for themselves.

These acts of compassion and kindness make our country stronger. This November, we have a chance to make it stronger still — by choosing a president who is consistent with our values, and whose moral compass points toward justice.”
– Robert Redford, July 8, 2020

My Take on USA Immigration

As we all know, immigration is a very complex and multi-layered issue in the USA.

In this post, I’ll just discuss the extremely polarizing issue of how to address the approximately 11 million illegal immigrants currently residing within the borders of the USA. For the complete picture, the number of legal immigrants, i.e., non-citizens holding official and current documentation, is about 37 million. Combined, immigrants account for about 15% of the USA’s total population of 324 million. Fifty (50) years ago, the percentage was 5%.

These statistics alone show that the people of the USA have big hearts for the people of the world and our country and are largely pro-immigration.  While we are a pro-immigration nation today, it doesn’t seem logical or correct to call the USA an immigrant nation, which is the descriptor widely used today by those who argue for more liberal USA immigration policies. Eighty (80) percent of the people who live in the USA today were born in this country and did not personally migrate to this country,  Therefore, they are not officially/statistically counted as an immigrant.  Of course,  somewhere in the 400+ year old family tree of all USA occupants, there is an immigrant, but that is ancestry, not current identity.

Haley Barbour, former Governor of Mississippi, has recently been quoted in our local newspaper as supporting what I consider to be a practical, common-ground immigration solution with which I do agree virtually 100% (and have for the past 15 years).

In the article, it was reported that Haley believes a starting point includes what he calls the givens:

  • America needs and is benefited by the labor immigrants provide.
  • Many [proportional to the normal curve applied to the human population] immigrants enhance the quality of life in communities.
  • Open borders are not a realistic policy for this or any other [sovereign] nation.
  • Entering the country illegally is a crime. Criminal acts must be punished. [Makes sense to me since I believe the Rule of Law preserves and protects (1) our cultural/religious values, civil rights, and freedoms; and (2) our ability sustained over time to provide assistance to others around the world].

Barbour then goes on to espouse what I believe to be a common-ground solution to the current illegal immigrant situation in the USA:

  • People who have entered the U.S. illegally but have been good citizens, have not committed crimes [other than illegal entry into the USA which is a federal misdemeanor], have paid their taxes, have supported themselves – they ought to be treated just like anybody else who commits a nonviolent crime.
  • They should be put on probation and have to pay a fine.
  • At the end of that probationary period, if they’ve been good citizens, then they ought to be allowed to get in line to try and get citizenship if they want it.
  • There are a lot of immigrants who entered the U.S. legally who are very good for our community and country.

We the people of the USA must move on from US Congressional “paralysis by analysis.” For the past several decades, Congress has been stuck on attempting to pass bipartisan, meaningful, and up-to-date immigration laws. Most of the reasons for this paralysis are related to partisan ideology/politics. The paralysis is also fueled somewhat by fear and fear-mongering on both sides of the political aisle, but mostly it is just basic politics “blocking and tackling.”

Also, we all, especially followers of Christ, lay and clergy, need to stop shaming and claiming moral high ground from people with whom we disagree [reference my Blog Post, Was Jesus a Refugee?], both conservative and liberal, who provide a variety of valid opinions/solutions concerning immigration .

For starters, since we don’t know the true heart of those with whom we disagree, let’s stop the vitriolic name calling that includes examples such as hater, child abuser, and fake Christians who couldn’t possibly love Jesus and immigrants, legal or illegal.

Rather, one helpful national conversation we could have is “how many legal immigrants and refugees can we absorb annually into our American culture and still (1) maintain our USA values, and (2) sustain our ability to help more people, citizens and immigrants-refugees, going forward.

The USA is composed of a very large majority of people, including liberals and conservatives, who are caring and giving people who want to help immigrants succeed and integrate into the USA culture in a peaceful and law-abiding manner.

That is a good thing.